The tree of (BLT) life

This counts as science right?




More like this

While I was away on vacation, my family made a stop in Corning NY to see the Corning Glass Museum. I had to snap this photo for PZ. Alas, all I had was the camera in my cellphone, so the resolution leaves something to be desired, but it's the thought that counts, right? As long as I'm posting…
CLICK HERE FOR UP TO DATE COVERAGE AT THE PRESS CENTER(Download Bracket) PDF | JPG BEN: Welcome, Ladies and Gentleman to the 2007 SCIENCE SPRING SHOWDOWN - the thinking person's ccomplement to the NCAA tournament! Sponsored by the fine folks at ScienceBlogs Basic Concepts. That's right people, it…
I'm at the Evolution 2008 conference, but I'm too tired to appreciate it — the only sleep I got was a few fitful hours on the redeye from Las Vegas, so I'm seriously concerned that I may fall asleep in my session this afternoon. Greg Laden has been instructed to use a cattle prod on me if I slow…
It's time for my annual post taking issue with Thomson Reuters (TR) Nobel Prize predictions. (2002, 2006, 2007a, 2007b, 2008, 2009, 2010) Because, yes, they're at it again. Can the winners of the Nobel Prize be correctly predicted? Since 1989, Thomson Reuters has developed a list of likely…

Well, it's not clear if they used neighbor-joining or Fitch-Margoliash, and they did not account for the bacterial flora that would be present in or on many of the ingredients.
Apart from that it looks like pretty solid science to me!
I look forward to reading the entire paper in the next issue of Science.

By nice_marmot (not verified) on 27 Feb 2011 #permalink