Via Digg, an article on hilarious Google searches. Hmm, reminds me of one I discovered a while back. (Below may or may not be NSFW, depending on your level of puritanism. And it can certainly lead to clicking which is definitely NSFW.)
Why, no Google, you pornography obsessed search engine, that is not what I meant at all.
Update 4/24: Another good physics related google search at Swan's on Tea.
More like this
Definitely bio. Definitely ephemera. Definitely NSFW...
Very NSFW. Not as bad as Eminem vs. Triumph.
...as I was reading this! But it's science! Thus, not NSFW by definition....
I was going to do a long screed on the efficacy of hygiene but this is much clearer. But NSFW, it is below the fold.
I've made similar mistakes. The google search for "man strftime", for instance, gives about 8 results for unix manual pages relating to various implementations of strftime. The google search for "man date", as I recall, is rather less helpful.
I think everybody in a technical field has probably found some pretty sketch stuff when googling for things related to LaTeX.