Confession of a classical sinner.
More like this
It is science fair season!
Some ditzy entrepreneur in California has a new twist on bottled water:
The Wall Street Journal's Alexandra Alter reports on the newest reason not to spend your money and time at church: shunning has returned, meaning that years of devotion to your religious institution can be cut off if you do som
Obama makes bridging our cultural divides look easy. He takes a potential faux-pas - talking about condoms in an evangelical megachurch - and manages to make birth control seem like a faith-based solution.
I thought you were "crazy busy." This is your third (maybe fourth?) post today.
"Impure thoughts" is a real groaner.
You think I write these posts at the time they are posted? ;)
Heck, it was none other than Saunders Mac Lane who said "It has taken me fifty years to understand classical mechanics."
One option is to read Arnol'd's [i]Classical Mechanics[/i], and then embrace a new mathematical life as a classical-quantum hermaphrodite! :)
I work with a Polish emigre. He showed me his notes [in Polish] from when he taught classical mechanics. He used a diagram to illustrate the following things.
If you start with classical mechanics. It becomes quantum mechanics when you assert H has a non-zero lower bound. It becomes a field theory when you assert \bar{h} has a non-zero lower bound. It becomes a relativistic theory when you assert that c has a finite upper bound. [So, a relativistic quantum field theory sets all three parameters].
So, the whole classical-quantum distinction has been lost on me, since I actually thought it was important. Sometimes I wonder if this parametric view skews my understanding of the state of affairs.