arXiv vs snarXiv

OMG hilarious: arXiv vs. snarXiv.

More like this

slacktivist: Sex & Money, part 2 "I'm being too polite here. I need to state this more vigorously because I need to put it in a way that will make my accusers fruitfully angry. So let me try this: The Bible is not a book about homosexuality and it will not allow itself to be treated as a book…
Just because I think this picture is absolutely hilarious:
Nothing to do with astronomy or physics (except for the perils of gravity), but this TV show is hilarious: Ninja Warrior. I don't get the channel G4 here in Tucson with expanded cable, but this is basically the Japanese version of the American Gladiators event: The Eliminator! If you have some…
One of my favorite YouTube channels is Epic Rap Battes of History. Some of my favorite battles include Darth Vader vs. Adolf Hitler (and, of course, the rematch), Mr. T vs. Mr. Rogers (hilarious!), Napoleon vs. Napoleon, Gandalf vs. Dumbledore, and, of course, my favorite of all time, Albert…

Fun indeed! Yah wanna prove, with (say) 20 guesses, that you can pick the real papers ... with (one-sided) confidence level P > 0.99?

Prove it: pick nâ¥16 out of 20 papers right (and I decline to give my score). :)

I stopped at 4 out of 5. One of those was easy (the fake paper misspelled Schwartzschild's name), but some of the others were pure guesswork.

By Eric Lund (not verified) on 04 Jun 2010 #permalink

10/10, woohoo! There are a few giveaways. The guy who makes up the fake papers uses the words "orientifold" and "right" in titles way more than real physicists do.

If "dyslexia" is a condition that confuses left-versus-right, then what should we call the condition that confuses funny-versus-serious? `Cuz reading the "SnarXiv" gives me a bad case of it!

The abstracts of the "SnarXiv" ... and its equally intriguing mathematical counterpart (by the same authors) "The Real Theorem Generator" ... reminds me irresistibly of with first 17 pages of the Petkovsek-Wilf-Zeilberger classic text A=B (including the preface by Knuth).

`Cuz haven't Petkovsek-Wilf-Zeilberger/Knuth carried to completionâwithin hypergeometric combinatoricsâprecisely the program that the "SnarXiv" and the "Theorem Generator" envision carrying out more across broader domains of math and physics?

Isn't it now an everyday reality, that young mathematicians and physicists are embracing the nomenclature of engineering ... by talking about "proof technologies", for example? And conversely, aren't young engineers embracing the nomenclature of math and physics, by focusing increasingly on the key role that shared notions of "naturality" play in practical systems engineering?

This is a topic that Alice and Bob are starting to think about quite a bit.

Back in the early 1970s, I remember when computer experts would joke about the coming day when "the CPU breaks, and so you just throw the CPU away" (hilarious laughter follows) ... and yet this is exactly what happened.

So what should we call the all-to-human incapacity to take STEM-related humor seriously ... "dysjocsia", perhaps? from the Latin "jocus"?