The Buzz: Beauty and the Dismal Science

i-86bff570b8d4302d47be2d153908086f-econ.jpg

Can the elegant models of mathematics and physics be applied to something so intrinsically complicated as the economic behavior of individuals? When economist Paul Krugman argued in The New York Times Magazine last week that the failure of economists to predict the current economic crisis was due to their reliance on beautiful but flawed models of perfect markets, mathematician and hedge fund manager Eric Weinstein immediately tweeted his disagreement, asking ScienceBloggers Chad Orzel and Dave Bacon for their takes as well. Chad brought his experience with physics to bear, while Dave offered a few words of advice: "Retreat not, economists, from the shouting hordes of anti-math naysayers at the gates, but head over to your physics, computer science, and math departments." Steinn Sigurðsson and Mike the Mad Biologist also weighed in on the article.

Tags

More like this

Paul Krugman's feature in the New York Times covers it all. If you haven't familiarized yourself with the subject, then find 15 minutes to read it.
There's been a lot of talk about the Newsweek article on economist Paul Krugman. But this part seems particularly relevant:
href="http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/13/paul-krugman-wins-economics-nobel/?hp">Paul Krugman href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6c61ac54-9922-11dd-9d48-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1">was awarded the
Our man in Chicago turned me on to Charlie Stross.  Little did I know, Stross' writings have become something of a sensation in the academic world.  One of the first blogs I read was Crooked