Panda relative discovered, Steve Steve overjoyed

i-f83e0409b971579e6c8dc740cc2e25f6-.earliest_panda_nyol933.jpg

This image released by the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology in Beijing shows front views of a new fossil panda skull, Ailuropoda microta, from Jinyin Cave, Guangxi, China, left, and a living giant panda skull, Ailuropoda melanoleuca, right. The first skull of the earliest known ancestor of the giant panda has been discovered in China, researchers report. Discovery of the skull, estimated to be at least 2 million years old, is reported by Russell L. Ciochon in the Tuesday June 19, 2007 edition of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (AP Photo/ Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Beijing)

I haven’t seen the PNAS paper yet, but will post more once I do. Some further details are here.

Update (6/19): The paper has appeared online as an Early Edition article.

Changzhu Jin, Russell L. Ciochon, Wei Dong, Robert M. Hunt Jr., Jinyi Liu, Marc Jaeger, and Qizhi Zhu
The first skull of the earliest giant panda
PNAS published June 19, 2007, 10.1073/pnas.0704198104

More like this

Yeah, things are still tough here at Tet Zoo Towers, and the time needed for blog-writing has yet to materialise. But the end is in sight, and things will be back to normal within the next few weeks. I hope.
I'm always telling people you need to understand development to understand the evolution of form, because development is what evolution modifies to create change. For example, there are two processes most people have heard of.
How can a seemingly trivial head injury kill you? To answer this, you need a little anatomy.

How long till AiG writes an article stating that this Panda is NOT a transitional, so bring no support for Darwinistiacs theories ?

I rather suspect that the skull at right isn't a *living* panda skull - although I'm sure it's a modern one...!

Heh! Correct. Wording is from the AP, not me.

By John Lynch (not verified) on 19 Jun 2007 #permalink