A tense moment


Via the White House Flickr site, a tense moment in the Situation Room yesterday, as the national security team was updated on the raid on a Pakistani compound where Osama bin Laden had been in hiding. The weight of the moment plays out a little differently on each face. The political, diplomatic, and military cost of failure would have been enormous. The mission was, as we all know by now, successful, and led to spontaneous parties in streets around the world, with firefighters in New York making an impromptu pilgrimage to the hole in the ground where the World Trade Center once stood. They told reporters that finally, almost ten years after the 9/11 attacks, they feel a sense of closure.

It remains to be seen what else this mission will change. It could give political cover to a more immediate withdrawal from Afghanistan, or for shutting down the prison at Guantanamo (trying the inmates in civilian courts, and then transferring them to federal penitentiaries or repatriating them to their native lands). Indeed, the inevitable boost in the president's poll numbers could grease the skids for his ongoing negotiations with Congress regarding domestic policy and raising the federal debt limit.

It's also unclear how this will change the geopolitics. Some observers are arguing that bin Laden had enough operational control of al Qaeda, and was a sufficiently potent symbol of the organization, that bin Laden's death could actually make a measurable change in the global terrorist movement. Internal liberation struggles throughout the Middle East and North Africa have cut off the knees of anti-Western movements, and removing bin Laden should also remove the movement's head. Even if other branches of al Qaeda seek to fill the void, it is hard to imagine them gaining the same reach and mystique that bin Laden had developed.

On the other hand, bin Laden was only one man, and his death cannot make up for the dead of 9/11, the Cole attack, the Embassy bombings, and other al Qaeda attacks. Nor can it compensate for the dead soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq, nor the civilians who died in those and other countries in the course of post-9/11 wars. Nor is his death likely to end the practice of secret warrantless wiretaps, torture in secret US prisons, or intrusive searches at airports. And so, alas, bin Laden's legacy lives on. With the complicity of the Bush administration, bin Laden undermined America's freedom, and though the Obama administration had the skill and organization to finally find and kill bin Laden, they do not seem to have the fortitude needed to end that enduring and disappointing legacy of al Qaeda's attacks.


More like this

I can't say I've ever understood the adulation Noam Chomsky gets in some lefty circles. His arguments are generally fairly banal, drifting into a caricature of liberalism.. I don't doubt that at some point in his life he may have been an incisive political commentator, but I've never seen it.…
Source. In a rare late night statement in the East Room of The White House Sunday, President Obama announced that Bin Laden is dead. This historic announcement raises more than questions than answers. How will this affect terrorism abroad and in the US? How will this affect our relationship with…
This is the beginning of the 8th year in which I'll be trying to understand what happened on 9/11. The eighth year in which I'll see a news clip from September 11, 2001, and feel like crawling inside myself. The eighth year in which the there is a hole in the New York skyline, and in lower…
Is it the 9/11 cranks saying it? Of course not. Instead it's the Wall Street Journal Editorial Page featuring Peter Hoekstra. And you wonder why we call the WSJ editorial page a denialist organization? In the mid-1990s, Bill Clinton's first Secretary of State, Warren Christopher, declared that…

the whole political go-around on the event set aside for a second,where have you seen that scene before? a Bourne flick perhaps?

I don't think much will change. Bin Laden was out of the loop for years, serving mainly as a figurehead and as a "guru" to the Al Qaeda leadership, which remains intact, including two American-born leaders. We'll keep Camp Gitmo open and continue seeking out the rest of the Al Qaeda leadership. Still this is a great moral victory for us.

By John Kwok (not verified) on 03 May 2011 #permalink

I think this will weaken Al-Qaeda, but not immediately eliminate it. Even a figurehead or guru provides some unifying force to what would otherwise a very uncohesive group of minor entities. Unless someone can provide that force, splits and power struggles are likely to occur. On the other hand, those splintered groups that were only very loosely associated with bin Laden to begin with will continue to exist and be active. Whether support for them will wane as other less radical movements gain remains to be seen; I have no idea how that will play out.

I see lots of adults watching a snuff movie. Gross.

I think it is a positive thing. We have done something we promised to do, and which a majority thought we could not do. It should send a message to other leaders that the same fate awaits them.

So far as the Obama administration being able to rescue the country from the multiple costly mistakes of the Bush administration, there are two things to think about. First the present administration is still infested with people who were part of the Bush administration, and others of like ilk. Secondly, repair always takes longer than destruction. I'm thinking 16 years of sanity (more or less) to repair the mistakes of the Bush administration; fighting wars on credit, etc.

By Jim Thomerson (not verified) on 04 May 2011 #permalink