So, what's the purpose of music

You would think it is easy to explain.

Some evolutionary psychologists suggest that music originated as a way for males to impress and attract females. Others see its roots in the relationship between mother and child. In a third hypothesis, music was a social adhesive, helping to forge common identity in early human communities.

That's nice. Can the evlutionary psychologists prove it?

``They're completely bogus explanations, because they assume what they set out to prove: that hearing plinking sounds brings the group together, or that music relieves tension," he [Steven Pinker] says. ``But they don't explain why. They assume as big a mystery as they solve." Music may well be innate, he argues, but that could just as easily mean it evolved as a useless byproduct of language, which he sees as an actual adaptation.

From the essay Survival of the harmonious at the Boston Globe.

More like this

That's nice. Can the evlutionary psychologists prove it?

.

`They're completely bogus explanations, because they assume what they set out to prove: that hearing plinking sounds brings the group together, or that music relieves tension," he [Steven Pinker] says. ``But they don't explain why. They assume as big a mystery as they solve." Music may well be innate, he argues, but that could just as easily mean it evolved as a useless byproduct of language, which he sees as an actual adaptation.

That's nice. Can he prove it?

By somnilista, FCD (not verified) on 06 Sep 2006 #permalink

Don't the gibbons sing? Perhaps it is innate.