NASA Press Conference - quick summary

Arsenic it is... but the point really isn't arsenic.

That is what Dr. Felisa Wolfe-Simon stressed at the end of the NASA press conference today - that the research being unveiled is just opening the door to other unexamined possibilities for life. She said "I am interested in exceptions, why aren't things constants in nature?"

Her team's new finding is that certain microbes are capable of creating DNA with arsenic rather than phosphorus as the molecular backbone. These are microbes closely related to well known microbes, but their ability to make this substitution is remarkable, and flies in the face of conventional biological wisdom. This discovery might not be as thrilling as aliens, but it calls into question a major assumption about the nature of life on Earth - that all life requires phosphorus to build DNA and other molecules. There are no other known examples of any other element substituting for any of the 6 major biological elements (carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur, & phosphorus) in fundamental biomolecules.

the assumption that all life would require phosphorus, and that arsenic is necessarily toxic to life because it resembles phosphorus has been used in predicting zones of potential habitability in our solar system. Astrobiologists will now have to expand their view of what locations are potentially habitable in the solar system and beyond. Additionally, scientists are going to have to start thinking about what other strange biological substitutions they may have been missing.

Until I can give the paper a thorough read and post something more detailed, check out this NYTimes article.

I am still hoping for the discovery, some day, of life on Earth (or elsewhere) totally unrelated to life as we know it, and with research like this continuing, that day might come sooner rather than later.

More like this

In his highly readable book, One Long Argument, Ernst Mayr breaks down the body of thought often referred to as "Darwin's Theory" into five separate and distinct theories, the second of which being "common descent." Darwin's second evolutionary theory (second by Mayr's count, not Darwin's) is…
Oh, great. I get to be the wet blanket. There's a lot of news going around right now about this NASA press release and paper in Science — before anyone had read the paper, there was some real crazy-eyed speculation out there. I was even sent some rather loony odds from a bookmaker that looked like…
In the wake of the NASA excitement over the new arsenic study, and my promise to give a detailed review of the paper itself, I have recruited a colleague with strong opinons about the work, a solid chemistry and microbiology background, and "Dr." in front of his name to share his analysis. I will…
NASA has made a bit of a stir by announcing a press conference for tomorrow at 2pm EST. Scientists are going to reveal some exciting new findings relvent to the search for extraterrestrial life. Some people are anticipating/hoping that they will announce that extraterrestrial life has been…

You say: "I am still hoping for the discovery, some day, of life on Earth (or elsewhere) totally unrelated to life as we know it,...."
At the risk of being "Off-topic" let me say: Try looking amongst the Coal Seam Gas industry in Queensland and the politicians there who approve draining the Great Artesian Basin so they can pollute the environment everywhere else.

Really, astrobiologists aren't looking for arsenic? My biochem class used the phosphorous-arsenic substitution as a simple example of how a small, very plausible, change could radically alter our fundamental biochemistry.

I said the same thing in my history class. No lie.39

By Antonio Lopez (not verified) on 29 Jan 2011 #permalink