More Than 90,000 U.S. Infants Are Victims

More like this

While the White House scrambles like mad to cover its butt and avoid any and all questions about what went wrong in the response to Katrina, at least some Republicans are breaking the party line talking points and saying what is obviously true, that the response at the Federal level was appalling
It was kind of depressing to see the post on Effect Measure ( href="http://scienceblogs.com/effectmeasure/2007/10/chemical_plants_internal_dange.php#more">Chemical plants: internal dangers, external costs) about the
Mike Brown has resigned as director of FEMA, and here's what cracks me up about the whole thing.

What's this now? You want our current administration to better care for defenseless children? Oh I see where the confusion is. Yeah, sorry...child abuse doesn't actually fall under their officially sanctioned "moral issues" list. You know--gay marriage and abortion?

What will Chertoff do about it? If he was smart, he would do what the last Democrat admin did: just blame creepy men and strangers for child abuse(the blame the patriarchy approach), and continue to ignore the fact that women commit the great, huge, obscenely large,under-studied, under-reported amount of it.
That way, we can build even more prisons for even more falsely accused men;-)
Oh, wait, that strategy is beginning to crumble:
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/florida/sfl-flfbudget0403sbapr03…

I got it! Ship the ebil child er-busin'mens off to Iraq!
oh...that's crumbling too...

*sigh* time to call the spade a spade....

By the real cmf (not verified) on 04 Apr 2008 #permalink