Another Oil Company Subsidy

Despite a chorus among citizenry and punditry to end oil company
subsidies, it turns out that yet another has been foisted upon us.
 What is worse, it was created under the guise of a populist
program:


Households will spend about $90 billion more this
year on gasoline if fuel prices remain at current levels, according to
a forecast by economists at Credit Suisse Holdings in New York. That
will consume about 80 percent of the more than $110 billion in rebate
checks the government is sending out.



So most of the rebate money will end up in the pockets of big oil.
 It will not boost spending.  It will not stimulate
the economy.  It would be much better to invest that money in
public transportation.  



(Source:
href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aRHF_n8OUeOM&refer=home">Bloomberg
)



More like this

Yeah.  Private companies are always more efficient that government programs.  According to a href="http://www.commondreams.org/news2007/1015-06.htm">recent study by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee:
In the NY Times, economist Bruce Bartlett opposes the refund stimulus plan:
Last Tuesday Matthew Warren [reported] in the Australian: Labor plans to rid Australian homes of off-peak electric hot water systems, in a move it claims will cut Australia's greenhouse gas emissions by 7.5million tonnes each year. ...
Cash for clunkers isn't leading to fewer carbon emissions--at least not in Germany.The New York Times reports today on the 50,000 cars (at least) in Germany that have been traded in for cash rebates to put to

Check out my blog regarding public transit and the financing thereof, or at least the way they currently do it in RI, and the way they plan to do it in the future.