String Theory Backlash

Sharon Begley has an interesting column today in the WSJ on the growing chorus of voices aiming to discredit string theory.

String theory isn't any more wrong than preons, twistor theory, dynamical triangulations, or other physics fads. But in those cases, physicists saw the writing on the wall and moved on. Not so in string theory.

"What is strange is that string theory has survived past the point where it should have been clear that it wouldn't work," says Mr. Woit. [Professor Peter Woit of Columbia University] Not merely survived, but thrived. Virtually every young mathematically inclined particle theorist must sign on to the string agenda to get an academic job. By his count, of 22 recently tenured professors in particle theory at the six top U.S. departments, 20 are string theorists.

Having just read a review copy of Lee Smolin's new book The Trouble With Physics, I must confess that I'm convinced. Smolin argues that string theory is responsible for the failure of physics to "make any real headway in the last 30 years." According to Smolin, string theory is slowly strangling particle physics, and moving a fundamental science into the realm of metaphysics. Woit's book, which is due out this fall, has a damning title: Not Even Wrong.

Begley ends her article on a harsh and sobering tone: "That string theory abandoned testable predictions may be its ultimate betrayal of science."

More like this

Sorry for the missed weeks of friday pathological programming language columns. To be honest, I'm running out of languages. I'm sure there must be more, but my usual sources (dealers?) are running out - so send links!
If you regularly follow comments on this blog, you'll know that I've been having a back-and-forth with a guy who doesn't know much about information theory, and who's been using his ignorance to try to assemble arguments against the
Bret Underwood, a friend of mine from my time in Madison, WI, saw my post on String Theory, and took issue with my statement that it wasn't testable. I'm still standing behind what I said, but let's address what Bret has to say.
Sometimes I can't seem to find just the right lab equipment I want for a particular experiment so I design it myself. Such was the case recently for a course I developed and teach entitled Science of Sound.

String theory is just a theory, not a fact! Teach the controversy!

Oh, wait, that sounds right this time.

By Eric Wallace (not verified) on 23 Jun 2006 #permalink