The New Yorker Ranks the Republicans vs. Science

And get's it wrong

What's amazing is they rank Newt first at the same time acknowledging he destroyed the Office of Technology Assessment.

Jon Huntsman may have the most rational scientific and technological policies of anyone in the field, but Gingrich, sometimes called Newt Skywalker, has far more passion. As Kelefa Sanneh argues in the current issue, the philosophy of Gingrichism is nothing but a combination of the idiosyncratic views of the man himself--which include his beliefs in the virtues of space exploration and his opposition to regulating the Internet, even when it comes to porn. He was an early adopter of Twitter, and he once made the cover of Wired. He is ranked atop Scientific American's recent "Geek Guide" to the 2012 candidates. As Sanneh notes, one of Gingrich's manifestos about information policy includes a preface by the science-fiction writer Jerry Pournelle, declaring, "It's raining soup, and Newt Gingrich has the blueprints for soup bowls."

His record is scarcely perfect. As Speaker, Gingrich abolished the Office of Technology Assessment--a move reminiscent of Nixon abolishing the White House's Office of Science and Technology Policy. But, for the most part, Gingrich has moved policy in the right directions. And he gets extra credit for sitting on the couch with Nancy Pelosi to talk about global warming.

So, he destroyed the office in congress that used science to evaluate legislation, as well as the efficacy of that legislation once enacted. He removed scientific guidance from the legislative branch, but because he's passionate about the internets that doesn't make him the worst thing to happen to science in the last 30 years?

I realize we're looking for the shiny turd in a cowpie here, but Gingrich? No way. Huntsman should be ranked first because he at least acknowledges global warming is real, a brave stand to take amongst a bunch of deniers. Whereas Gingrich dumped that chapter from his book after Rush Limbaugh suggested he might actually be on the side of reality. What's going to matter more in the next 4 years? A president that took a brave stance on regulating internet porn? Or one that took a stance on global warming?

None of these guys has any scientific chops but that seems too much to ask in politicians on either side these days. But this analysis by the New Yorker is embarrassingly superficial.

More like this

To keep the conversation about the Science Debate 2008 going, I decided to post, one per day, my ideas for potential questions to be asked at such a debate. The questions are far too long, though, consisting more of my musings than real questions that can be asked on TV (or radio or online,…
I have a whole pile of science-y book reviews on two of my older blogs, here and here. Both of those blogs have now been largely superseded by or merged into this one. So I'm going to be slowly moving the relevant reviews over here. I'll mostly be doing the posts one or two per weekend and I'll…
From Think Progress, we learn that Newt Gingrich's American Solutions for Winning the Future (ASWF) group is choosing people for 2009 Entrepreneur of the Year awards by his Business Defense and Advisory Council. One little problem though: Pink Visual is a porn DVD superstore -- not the type of…
Polish science-fiction author Stanislaw Lem, author of The Cyberiad, Solaris and His Master's Voice, died on March 27. His ashes have been buried in the Salwatorski Cemetery in Krakow. Link to a short article on Candada.com, here. Born in 1921 in Poland, Lem began training as a medical student in…

The OTA was used by the Organized Crime Tobacco Mafia to further it own 50 year RICO conspiracy to dent the science of killer-tobacco. The archives of trial documents have been online for more than 10 years by court order as part of the case settlement against the Tobacco Racketeers.

Michael Gough particularly stands out, writing public letters denouncing cigarette smoking while taking money from the Tobacco Criminals to deny existing science on tobacco deaths. Michael Gough co-authored "Silencing Science" with "white coat" junkman Steve Milloy, while collecting laundered tobacco money as Koch-operated Cato Institute paychecks. Gough was partnered with the TASSC criminal organization, moving on to denying climate science after the tobacco paychecks lessened.

Apparently, getting rid of the politically-influenced OTA does count as pro-science, and some people understand that. Just because some group claims to be science, or has the word science in it, does not mean it is not a criminal fraud organization.

http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/
http://goo.gl/LwpNW
874 results from tobacco documents legacy library for Michael Gough.

http://goo.gl/UNZia
119 documents found: "Michael Gough" OTA

http://goo.gl/cC1WD
16 documents found: "Michael Gough" TASSC

http://goo.gl/8Golk
194 documents found: "Michael Gough" Cato Institute

http://goo.gl/D6rVF
18 documents found. "Michael Gough" "Steve Milloy"

I would like you to bear in mind that there are literally 40 millions of tobacco documents filling more than one warehouse which have not yet all been scanned into computer-searchable form. These documents should be considered only partial records, not complete.

The OTA was corrupted and anti-science at it's demise. Newt however should not get credit for destroying it, as there are always many political factions disrupting the efforts of their opponents teams for arcane power struggle reasons that do not have the public good involved at all.