Radley Balko reports:
Here's a wildcard for you: I have it on reasonably good authority that an unlikely retirement might be on the way, too. A Supreme Court insider told me several weeks ago that Souter may well retire. He apparently told friends and family that he has always planned to step down upon turning 65, and that he'd rather return to New Hampshire year-round than continue to spend time in D.C. He's 65 now.
Yowzah. This could get really, really ugly.
I had said, just about 25 hours ago, that I wish that John Paul Stevens would resign, and that he would be replaced by a constitutionalist justice. He is the oldest of the justices, so I had had him on my mind as a possibility for retirement. But a Souter retirement could be just as good. It would give the son a chance to correct the mistake that his father made... A decision that had it been different, could have overturned Roe v. Wade.
Yeah, let's see some septic coathangers. Those little bitches deserve to die for having sex.