Life Sciences Companies Get Behind Obama

i-16946c1ea163348b3a891fffcd4c84e1-HopeObama.jpg

From The Scientist's Newsblog:

In an industry known for backing Republicans, Sen. Barack Obama has emerged as a surprising pharma favorite in the US presidential election.

In April, Obama won a mock election at the annual DTC national meeting, a drug advertising conference, with a 53% to 46% victory over Sen. John McCain. Drug companies have also put the money where their mouth is: Pharma has donated three times more to the Obama campaign than to McCain's.

According to a Bloomberg News report citing data from the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP), pharma execs and employees have donated $450,094 to Obama, compared to $132,575 to McCain. CRP's Web site also lists figures for donations that include pharmaceutical companies and makers of medical devices and other health-related products: Obama is ranked as the top recipient of donations in that category with $848,001, while McCain is in fourth place (behind Clinton and Romney) with $347,375. It's a clear contrast to the 2004 election, in which drug industry donations to George W. Bush almost doubled those to John Kerry.

This year's top pharma donations come from Pfizer, Amgen, and Johnson & Johnson, according to CRP's website.

More like this

Before heading off to the Charleston Conference last week, I blogged about the big announcement of Pierre Lassonde's big $25 million donation to York to found the Lassonde School of Engineering.
With hundreds of seemingly worthy charities out there, how do we decide which ones to donate to? Even if we eliminate charities that aren't effective, there are still too many choices, and too little money, to donate to all of them.
This year's DonorsChoose challenge is doing pretty well, with the total standing at a bit over $2,200. Thanks to all who have donated thus far.
As you have no doubt noticed, the annual DonorsChoose fundraiser is under way, raising money to help school teachers and children.

Anyone think that this is primarily because McCain has been big on restricting campaign financing and those companies are still a bit upset that their money can't buy a candidate as easily?