Dienekes has a nice post up on the follies and failures of historical population genetics. As he notes, part of the problem is that people really want to find x instead of !x, and with a statistical science that is really, really, bad.
More like this
A few days ago I saw that Dienekes commented on a recent paper published in The American Journal
Dienekes points out that John Hawks is staring in a new National Geographic
Dienekes and Kambiz both hit a new pape
One of the things that really pisses me off about the Evolution-Creation "debate" is that it uses up oxygen that could be profitably allotted to documenting the tsunami of data emerging out of the "post-genomic" era.