Making a "difference"

I've been reading up on the field of cliodynamics recently. But despite the importance of broader macrosocial dynamics, the suicide of the Anthrax scare suspect is a reminder that proximately one determined person can sway the actions of nations....

Tags

More like this

Martin has responded at length to my posts whe
On this Sunday's Weekend Edition on NPR there was a piece titled Removing Religion from the Holidays a Tall Order.

I'm tempted to let it stay there and redirect people to a topless Spanish babe, but the link for "cliodynamics" is in error.

Are you sure it was one person?

True, one person died. But that doesn't mean only one person was involved. At least 3 or perhaps 4 people told ABC news that the evidence implicated Iraq. Who were these people?

Let's not be too hasty in calling the case closed.

See Vital unresolved anthrax questions and ABC News for much more.

The previous prime suspect sued for damages and collected, after his case was dropped because there never was any evidence against him. The investigation of Ivins consisted solely of interviewing everyone who knew him, and convincing them the FBI needed just a little more evidence to convict him, so of course this turned all his family, friends, coworkers, neighbors, and the rest of his community against him. This is the modernized high-speed version of Kafka's nightmares. This 'ear poison' destroys all of the target's social support, pulling away every single one, leaving him utterly alone.

He may have committed suicide because his innocence failed to protect him from the government destroying his life. Or he may have been murdered, using the 'suicide' as evidence of guilt, so that the FBI can close the case as 'solved' without ever having a hope of solving it.

Had he actually been guilty, he could have taken refuge in North Korea as soon as the FBI started in on him.

By Rose Colored Glasses (not verified) on 01 Aug 2008 #permalink

I'll ignore the Ivins example: if you think of events in history as genes, you can see how a single "mutant" event at the right time could change history. Especially if you accept SJG's conclusion that evolution is contingent, with significant path dependency and founder effects.

By John Emerson (not verified) on 01 Aug 2008 #permalink

After the sad case of the Atlanta Olympics chap, and then the poor sod who was the first "suspect" for the anthrax attacks, I see no reason - none - to believe the FBI on Ivins. I recall the other Federal Agency that slaughtered all those religious loonies at Waco, and its disgraceful behaviour at Ruby Ridge, and wonder what the hell goes on in your Federal government.