tags: citation, book reviews
Wow, one of my book reviews was cited on the authors' webpage. It's nice to see that my writing is appreciated outside of the blogosphere, even if it is only a book review. I never would have thought that anything I wrote would be cited alongside Nature, Neuron, New Scientist, Psychology Today and the Washington Post.
More like this
Over at the Nature blogs, they're soliciting comments and opinions about open peer review:
One of the much-hyped benefits of social networking is that it provides a way to get personalized recommendations about businesses from a wider network. If I want to tell the world that the coffee place in my neighborhood has the best cappuccino this side of Seattle, I can do that (and it does)!
A long time ago, in a blog far far away, I ran a small poll about paper refereeing. The poll asked "What is your ratio of reviewed to submitted manuscripts?". The results were
I came across this Science letter to the editor about a "gradual peer review process" by the associate editor for Plant Signalling and Behavior, Co
Congratulations, Grrl! But that isn't any surprise to me - I always read your writing as soon as it appears on the feed aggregator. You write compellingly, sensitively, intelligently and wittily. How could anyone NOT quote you and include you when you review their work? :*)
Congratulations.
About time your reviews got the recognition they deserve.
Hopefully it will become a trend.
Whoooo Hoooooo!!! It's long over due in my opinion and what a smart fellow to notice! Keep up the great work,Luv Ya...
I am delighted to see your work being recognised in this way too.
Well Done!
From *just* another reader of no science background but who loves reading science writing that invites greater understanding of things previously found "too hard".
I thank you.
:)
AttaGRRL!
Great to see, you're being read by the right people (and not just us!).
Your next task is to get a bad review cited on an author's webpage.
Bob