OK, it was yesterday, but it's still pretty funny. In response to this post about Answers Research Journal, a peer-reviewed creationist journal, Joshua of The Adventures of Tobasco de Gama writes:
Hmm. Do you have to use the "Blogging About Peer-Reviewed Research" tag/icon when rebutting ARJ articles?
Heh.
More like this
Slate has the goods on the style manual for Answers Research Journal, which is "a professional, peer-reviewed technical journal for the publication of interdisciplinary scientific and other relevant research from th
So, Answers in Genesis cranked out the first issue of its new journal, and with all deliberate speed! It's remarkable. I'm guessing that creation research doesn't take quite as long as, say, real science. The pilot issue is a true testament to the idiocy of the Creation Cult.
NEW: Very first look at Ubuntu Linux 15.04 Vivid Vervet Beta Mate Flavor
Thanks, Mike. I pretty much live for making snarky comments, so I appreciate the recognition. ;)
(As for the 1-31-07 post, I have to admit with sadness that the image isn't mine. It's just one of those things that swept across the internet seemingly within minutes of the BPD releasing photos of the Deadly Terrorist LED Mooninite last year.)
I think we should submit hoax articles to the hoax journal, with author "pen names" such as:
I.N.O. Goddidit
Noah Sark
Cat S. Troffic-Floods
Izzy N. DeBible
Perhaps ScienceBlogs could host a contest, to come up with possible titles and abstracts.
>:-)
Brilliant article. And a good example at the same time.
very thanks for article