For reasons that really aren't important, I found myself doing some Google Image searches for pictures of political leaders, and I was struck by how many of the top results were caricatures. It occurred to me that you could probably say something about the collective emotional age of the Internet by looking at the distribution of real and mocking pictures in these search results.
Some data (well, plural anecdotes, at least) for your consideration:
- A search for George W. Bush yields 18 images, 5 of which are modified in some allegedly satirical way, and two of which appear to be real but unflattering images.
- A search for Harry Reid yields 18 images, of which 4 are modified in some allegedly satirical way, and two are political cartoons.
- A search for Nancy Pelosi yields 18 images. 9 of the 18 are modified in some allegedly satirical way, one is a real photo with a lewd comment, and one is either a deliberately mislabeled cheesecake shot or a really unfortunate name coincidence.
The conclusion is left as an exercise for the reader.
More like this
I was going to write a series of posts describing each essay in the current Cites & Insights, and still plan to do so.
Since my post a couple of weeks ago about NASA and the antenna evolution experiment,
I've been meaning to write a followup. In both comments and private emails, I've gotten
a number of interesting questions about the idea of fitness landscapes, and some of the things
Why use Google, which will give you ten million irrelevant
hits, when all you really want to do, is to find the juicy stuff on
ScienceBlogs?
Well, you can navigate to the ScienceBlogs home page, and search there,
This is absolutely brilliant. MnCSE has taken advantage of Google's ability to set up custom search filters to create special purpose search engines.