Authorial Issues

i-59d03f349b436f96b162b8cf03b41e27-authorbuzz.jpg

Self-expression is a human ideal, but just as you can be a virtuoso with a hammer, you can be a hack with a paintbrush. On Bioephemera, Jessica Palmer questions the value of painted canvas when the painters "neither recognize nor are particularly interested in" the scenes they produce. In the case of Chinese technicians who imitate western styles for the American market, Jessica asks, "isn't an artist's active creative input, his or her emotion and imagination, or at least some degree of innovation, essential to create 'art'?" Razib Khan considers literary issues on Gene Expression, saying it's okay that novelist James Patterson employs a team of co-writers to ink in his many projects. "The idea of the author as the lonely genius is very powerful," writes Razib, but "there's no reason that a workmanlike collaborative writing process necessarily entails lowest-common denominator fiction." On Confessions of a Science Librarian, John Dupuis compares what things an author can and cannot control in the publishing process. And On The Book of Trogool, Dorothea Salo shares the obstacles of authority control, when many authors may have the same name, and one author may have many.

Links below the fold.

Tags

More like this

There's been a lot of discussion online lately about the relative importance of the position of an author name. Is it more impressive to be a first author on a report? If so, how much?
Like the title says: Happy New Year! Looking back at the list of top scited papers on scirate.com, shows some good fun indeed:
Nautilus, Nature's blog for authors, has a guest post by Robin Rose on long author lists, entitled "What's an author?".
Dr. Isis considers a downside to having coauthors and an ethical question it raises: