French Policy Discriminatory and Oppressive

I've written quite a bit about the French law forbidding students from wearing "visible religious symbols" or clothing. Howard Friedman is reporting that the French government has now decided, after much lobbying, that Sikhs can wear patkas (an under-turban) or headscarves, but not turbans, in school. Meanwhile, no other religious group has gotten such a dispensation from the government. Muslims are forbidden from wearing headscarves or burkas, Jews from wearing yarmulkes and Christians from wearing visible crosses. The current French prime minister, Dominique de Villepin, said several months ago that the government was willing to negotiate over this policy with the Sikhs due to "the specificity of Sikh community, which is very well respected in France." Apparently the Sikhs are more "specific" than Muslims...whatever that could possibly mean. This is discrimination, plain and simple. And it is a violation of multiple human rights treaties that the French government has signed.

More like this

UK Sikhs accuse BBC of racism:
Mutatis mutandis is a Latin phrase used by philosophers to indicate that an argument made in one circumstance carries over to another, "the necessary changes having been made."
This story just keeps getting worse. In New Delhi on Friday, French Foreign Minister Dominique De Villepin said that the French government would consider exempting Sikhs from the new law banning religious clothing and symbols:
I don't normally blog about stuff like this, but I've decided to link to this story about an assault on a Sikh American veteran by a police officer.

This happens too often in european nations (and canada) because they don't seem to have as clear of a freedom of speech as we luckily do. It's a shame because many less economically affluent nations have better protection of speech, Brazil for example.