Firefox 3.0 is fast

Tags

More like this

Maybe you missed it, but the huge surge of downloads crashed their servers for about 2 hours. Maybe linking isn't such a hot idea right now.

But yeah, I have it, and it's pretty fast. There are a few extensions I wish would make themselves compatible by changing the version string, changing only 4 characters of code at most, though.

I've been messing with FF3b3 but the one thing that kills me is no Sage. I love Sage for aggregating my RSS feeds.

I finally got through! YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY!!!!!!!!

By themadlolscientist (not verified) on 17 Jun 2008 #permalink

p.s. I'm ROFLingMAO at this juxtaposition of recent posts:

* Who you have sex with....
* Bobby Jindal: Creationist (???)...Politician!!!!

Not me! I don't wanna get a bad disease. ;-)

By themadlolscientist (not verified) on 17 Jun 2008 #permalink

Yeah, much faster. And, so far, with no obvious memory leak. I used to have to restart FF2 almost once a day.

7.3 million and counting, with a little over 2 hours to go.

By themadlolscientist (not verified) on 18 Jun 2008 #permalink

There are advantages to FF3's performance especially for people like me who have many extensions, or as my brother puts it, "a 'roided-out fox"

If all you are after is speed, Safari is fast too. Ditto for Opera 9.5.

I use a mix, depending on need. For most uses, I prefer Opera as it has introduced excellent user features well ahead of the other browsers, has good tools for developing websites and is very stable. FF's biggest point, to me, is the plug-in collection, rather than the browser per se.

By BioinfoTools (not verified) on 20 Jun 2008 #permalink