1. illconsidered
  2. ABCNews.com: Climate Science Skepticism: 5 Controversial Claims

ABCNews.com: Climate Science Skepticism: 5 Controversial Claims

By illconsidered on April 20, 2010.

Last week I was interviewed by Ki Mae Heussner for an article on ACBNews.com. That article can be viewed here.

Anyone coming here from there via the "How to Talk to a Climate Sceptic" link, it was incomplete, click here.

I think that in the broader scheme of "science says sky is blue, Republicans disagree" journalistic balance, the article does well enough. It is a big topic to cover well as a one off assignment, which this may have been. I did not find any previous work of Ki Mae's in this area.

Tags
Announcements
abc news
climate change
global warming
ki mae huessner
sceptic guide

More like this

The value of polling scientists
There have been various attempts to survey scientists opinions about climate change. Wiki has an article on this: Scientific opinion on climate change. Check the recent history for another attempt... :-) All of these attempts have various methodological problems which I'm sure you can think of for…
Link love and long tails
A post up at Bayblab is causing a bit of a stir; ScienceBlogs.com is singled out as an incestuous conclave of hacks* where bloggers are paid substantial sums to turn out tabloid-quality science writing. Alright, maybe such a summary isn't entirely accurate, but the post by "Anonymous Coward" paints…
Defining the Journalism vs. Blogging Debate, with a Science Reporting angle
You know I have been following the "death of newspapers" debate, as well as "bloggers vs. journalists" debate, and "do we need science reporters" debate for a long time now. What I have found - and it is frustrating to watch - is that different people use different definitions for the same set of…
Insincere, or just sincerely off-base?
So I get a lot of "sceptical" comments on the "How to Talk to a Sceptic" guide, as one might well imagine. They cover quite a range from subtly misguided to poorly informed to angry political rants. I always try to answer if it seems like there might be a point. A recent comment, made on the main…

Wow! Have you read the comments at ABC lately? I posted two to try to educate the deniers but they insist on bringing up the same tired memes: CO2 lags T, 31,000 scientists don't agree, consensus isn't science, etc. I wish people would actually do some basic research before they begin spouting off on news sites and blogs.

I just hope that the lurkers observe the way the deniers write and how they support their arguments vs. how we do so.

Scott A. Mandia, Professor of Physical Sciences
Selden, NY
Global Warming: Man or Myth?
My Global Warming Blog
Twitter @AGW_Prof
"Global Warming Fact of the Day" Facebook Group

Yeah, good job, Coby.

But its funny that when you get brought into the public eye you get time for about 30 seconds of commentary.

The veterans and sophomores (like me) of this blog have of course heard it all before so its always a dumb down to see how the media covers it. I get interviewed about 2-3 times a year because of my research (which has nothing to do with climate) and its the same thing. You've got a minute to make a point that really needs at least 30 to be given even rudimentary justice.

But keep fighting the good fight, Coby.