Taxons Wanted

I'm not taking as much heat as the other two amateur taxonomists on ScienceBlogs, but I'll also throw the topic open for suggestions. So, if I left your favorite sub-field of physics out of my Geek Taxonomy, drop me a comment suggesting a field that I left out, and what I ought to say about it. ( They needn't be serious.) If I get any good suggestions, I'll post an updated Taxonomy of Physics incorporating the suggestions.

If you have strong opinions about sub-fields of biology or anthropology, be sure to weigh in over at the Daily Transcript or Afarensis.

Tags

More like this

If you could sit down for lunch, or coffee, one-on-one, with a Very Very Big Name in your field (think Nobel Laureate or, for the CS crowd, Turing Award winner, or similar), what questions would you ask her/him?
When we start looking at fields, there are a collection of properties that are interesting. The simplest one - and the one which explains the property of the nimbers that makes them so strange - is called the characteristic of the field. (In fact, the
The Female Science Professor turns over the rocks and brings the real clash of cultures into the bright light of reason...
A month ago, Eric Schwitzgebel wrote a post critical of meta-analysis, suggesting that studies finding null results don't tend to get published, thus skewing meta-analysis results.

Condensed Matter Physics:
This may be the largest single field of physics, and it's probably the most important in everyday terms.

And you call elementary particle physicists arrogant? puh-leez. FermiLab roxors.

All kidding aside, I think you hit the nail on the head for the most part. You could add on the relatively minor branches like non-linear dynamics, geophysics, and even physics education research (i.e. Carl Wieman).

And you call elementary particle physicists arrogant? puh-leez. FermiLab roxors.

Well considering the fact that Chad's an AMO physicist, it's hardly arrogant for him to be promoting condensed matter as the most important...