Stringamathing

I've got a grant proposal to review, and a progress report to write for one of my own grants, so you're getting short, link-y physics blogging:

- The Strings 2006 conference has ended, with the participants apparently deciding to keep up with this "string theory" thing (maybe you've heard of it?) for a little while longer. Talk slides from many of the speakers are available here. Of course, if you can understand them, you probably already knew that, and if you didn't know that, you probably won't get much from the slides, but there you go.

- The Wall Street Journal piece talking about Peter Woit's book and string theory in general is provided outside their annoying registration wall by the Northwest Florida Daily News. I thought it was fairly unremarkable, but a lot of people have remarked on it, so I thought I should publicize the link to the full text, for those who aren't interested in paying the WSJ for it.

- Speaking of that article, David Appell has posted some reasonable thoughts about it (though he kind of flubs some math in the middle).

And there's your string theory update for the week.

i-bc34b702798f01b10409f7481ac9dc21-link_donorschoose_small.gif

More like this

Sorry for the missed weeks of friday pathological programming language columns. To be honest, I'm running out of languages. I'm sure there must be more, but my usual sources (dealers?) are running out - so send links!
If you regularly follow comments on this blog, you'll know that I've been having a back-and-forth with a guy who doesn't know much about information theory, and who's been using his ignorance to try to assemble arguments against the
Bret Underwood, a friend of mine from my time in Madison, WI, saw my post on String Theory, and took issue with my statement that it wasn't testable. I'm still standing behind what I said, but let's address what Bret has to say.
Sharon Begley has an interesting column today in the WSJ on the growing chorus of voices aiming to discredit string theory.

It is very entertaining watching catfights over the stringy enterprise. In the meantime, the rest of us can work on theories with testable results.